AG formation
The CHF 100,000 stock corporation, the usual choice for a holding: substance, a non-public shareholder register, shares that move freely.
AG formationA Swiss holding is an ordinary AG or GmbH built to hold participations, and since the 2020 tax reform, the relief comes from the participation deduction and Switzerland’s treaty network, not the abolished holding privilege. We structure the participations, the substance and the treaty position first, then incorporate against it.
Participation deduction and treaties, not the privilege abolished in 2020.
A Swiss holding company is an ordinary AG or GmbH under the Code of Obligations whose purpose is to hold participations in other companies. There is no separate holding legal form. The reason to put one in Switzerland is tax: qualifying dividends and capital gains are largely relieved, and the treaty network keeps cross-border dividend flows efficient. The one thing to get right at the start is that this is the post-2020 regime, not the old one.
The cantonal holding privilege was abolished on 1 January 2020 by the TRAF reform. Holdings are now taxed under ordinary rules, with relief delivered through the participation deduction. Any plan built on a Swiss “holding status” is working from a regime that no longer exists.
Two mechanisms do the work after the 2020 reform: the participation deduction on income, and the treaty network on outbound dividends. Neither is automatic; both depend on how the holding is structured.
| Item | Before 2020 | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Cantonal holding privilege | Exemption from cantonal income tax | Abolished (TRAF) |
| Dividend income | Exempt under privilege | Participation deduction (≥10% or CHF 1m) |
| Capital gains on participations | Exempt under privilege | Participation deduction (≥10%, held ≥1 yr) |
| Outbound dividend WHT | 35%, treaty-reduced | 35%, treaty- / EU-agreement-reduced |
| Substance expected | Lighter in practice | Real board, office, management |
The table shows the shape; the number depends on the canton, the size of each participation and where substance sits. We model the effective rate against the actual group before the holding is formed, not from a generic “Swiss holdings are tax-free” claim that stopped being true in 2020.
The participation deduction relieves qualifying dividend and gains income in every canton, so a holding is not a hunt for the lowest headline rate the way a trading company is. The ordinary rate matters for the parts the deduction does not reach: interest, service or management income the holding earns itself, and the annual cantonal capital tax on its equity. For those, canton still counts.
| Canton | Combined rate | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Lucerne | 11.66% | Lowest in Switzerland |
| Zug | 11.71% | The usual holding seat |
| Nidwalden | 11.97% | Low-tax central Switzerland |
| Geneva | 14.70% | Higher, but deep substance pool |
| Zurich | 19.47% | Notional interest deduction available |
The order matters: the participation, tax and substance design comes first, and the incorporation is built to fit it. Timings overlap; the entity itself sits in the two-to-four-week range.
What the holding will own, the qualifying thresholds, the treaty position of the ultimate owners, and the effective rate by candidate canton.
AG or GmbH, capital, the resident board and office, and the substance the structure needs to be respected as Swiss-resident.
Drafting the articles around the participations, opening the blocked capital account, and the bank confirmation the notary requires.
Notarisation and the commercial-register entry that brings the holding into existence, with the share and beneficial-owner registers opened.
Contributing or transferring the existing participations into the holding, the bank account, and the ongoing substance and reporting.
The share capital (CHF 100,000 for an AG or CHF 20,000 for a GmbH) is the holding’s own equity, not a fee. The cost of building the holding is separate: the tax and participation structuring, notary and register fees, the resident board and office, and the contribution of existing shareholdings.
We quote a fixed budget in writing against the structure before any work begins. The value is a holding that withstands scrutiny and delivers the relief, not one that merely exists on the register.
Federal issuance stamp duty (Emissionsabgabe) of 1% applies to equity a company issues, but the first CHF 1 million of capital is exempt (Art. 6 Federal Stamp Duty Act). A CHF 100,000 holding pays none. It only appears when a holding is capitalised well above CHF 1m, or when existing participations are contributed as equity above that line — and even then, contributions made under a qualifying restructuring (FusG) are exempt. This is exactly the kind of threshold that is cheap to plan around at formation and expensive to trip over afterwards, so we size the capital and the contribution route against it.
Both forms can hold participations and both qualify for the participation deduction — the entity choice carries no tax advantage either way. It turns on privacy, transferability and capital. Most holdings are an AG; a small single-owner holding can be a GmbH. The full detail is in our AG formation and GmbH formation guides; the dimensions that decide a holding are these.
| Dimension | AG | GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum capital | CHF 100,000 (≥ 50,000 paid in) | CHF 20,000 (fully paid) |
| Shareholders in public register | No — only the board is listed | Yes — owners named on Zefix |
| Transferring shares | By endorsement; no meeting needed | Written form + two-thirds resolution |
| Capital band for staged changes | Yes (Art. 653s–653v CO) | None |
| Typical holding fit | Groups, investors, exits, privacy | Small single-owner holding |
For a holding that will take investment, move participations or plan an exit, the AG’s free transfer and non-public register usually decide it. Where the holding is one owner sitting above one company and cost is the constraint, the GmbH does the same job for less capital. We confirm the choice against the group and the exit plan before forming it.
A holding is a structure, not a saving in itself. It earns its cost only when there is participation income to relieve and a treaty position to protect. In several situations the cost of building and maintaining one outweighs anything it returns, and we say so before forming it:
None of these rules out a Swiss holding; each is a test it has to pass. We run the tests first, and if a holding is not the answer, we say which structure is.
A holding that actually delivers the relief rests on more than a registration:
The single most common error we correct is a structure built on the old holding privilege, abolished in 2020. Today the relief is conditional (on meeting the participation thresholds, on real substance, and on the treaty position) and a letterbox holding is increasingly challenged by foreign tax authorities. A holding designed for the pre-2020 regime can fail exactly where the owner expected the saving. We structure for the rules as they are now, so the relief survives a foreign tax audit, not just a Swiss registration.
Registering the entity is routine. Structuring it for the post-2020 relief, the treaty network and real substance — that is the work, and it is what we have done for cross-border groups since 2014.
The structure designed for the participation deduction and post-TRAF taxation, not a privilege that no longer exists, so the relief is real.
The withholding-tax and treaty position worked out for the route up to the ultimate owner before the holding is formed, not discovered at the first distribution.
A resident board, office and genuine management activity, so the holding is respected as Swiss-resident where it counts, abroad.
The CHF 100,000 stock corporation, the usual choice for a holding: substance, a non-public shareholder register, shares that move freely.
AG formationA ring-fenced Swiss entity under a foreign parent, often the operating company a holding sits above.
Swiss subsidiaryThe resident board and registered office a holding needs for substance and to satisfy Art. 718 CO.
Resident director & officeRated 5.0 / 5 from 38 reviews on Google. Read them on Google →
“Perfekter Service! Wir wollten eine AG in der Schweiz übernehmen und hatten kaum Zeit – innerhalb weniger Tage war alles organisiert, inklusive Notar, Handelsregister und Bank.”
“We consulted Goldblum and Partners for structuring our crypto project under Swiss law. Their team was clear about the threshold between non-custodial and financial-intermediary status.”
“Équipe sérieuse. La documentation AML fournie était claire et adaptée à notre activité crypto. Je recommande.”
“Professionisti veri. Conoscono bene la legge svizzera e si sono occupati di ogni aspetto del passaggio azionario.”
Tell us what it will hold and where the owners sit. A partner maps the participation, tax and treaty position, then forms the holding against it — structuring before incorporation, not after.