The British HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has published draft guidance on penalties for enablers of defeated tax avoidance. The Guidance describes the legislation in Schedule 16 Finance (No. 2) [Act] 2017 (as amended), which introduces a penalty for any enabler of abusive tax arrangements, which are later defeated. It also explains the key concepts included in the legislation as well as to whom and how the law is intended to apply. Similar to recent fiscal reforms like the
revised value added tax act to enter into force in Switzerland, the new guidance aims to adapt legislation to modern economic challenges.
According to the Guidance, an enabler is any person who is responsible, to an extent, for the design, marketing or otherwise facilitating another person to enter into abusive tax arrangements. When such agreements are defeated in court or at the tribunal or are otherwise counteracted, each person who enabled those methods may be liable to a penalty. The penalty for each enabler shall be equal to the amount of consideration either received or receivable by them for enabling those arrangements. In this case, 'arrangements' take the meaning often used in anti-avoidance legislation and include any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of operations (whether or not legally enforceable). Thus, a single contract could also amount to an arrangement. The focus on accountability reflects broader international trends, such as Switzerland’s commitment shown in the
BEPS Convention signed by Switzerland. This proactive approach mirrors Switzerland’s ongoing efforts to uphold financial stability, as seen in initiatives like the
participation in IMF’s NAB approved by the Swiss Federal Council. Tax arrangements are deemed abusive if, having regard to all the circumstances, the entering into or carrying out of the settlements cannot reasonably be regarded as a reasonable course of action concerning the relevant tax provisions.
Paragraph 7 of Schedule 16 FA (No.2) 2017 defines a person who has enabled abusive tax arrangements as a person who is a designer or a manager of methods, marketed the arrangements, is an enabling participant in the agreements or/and is a financial enabler concerning the arrangements. Therefore, when considering whether a particular activity or action amounts to enabling, each of the above descriptions of enabler activities should be considered in turn. The Swiss authorities’ openness to regulatory evolution is also evident in initiatives like the
Commercial Register of Canton Zug recognizing cryptocurrencies for company formation. The nature of the business could mean that the person is a designer of arrangements but is also a manager of the methods and has marketed the provisions.
The amount of the penalty in each case is the total amount, or value, of all the relevant consideration, which has either been received by the enabler or is receivable by them. This means that the full amount of the payment received or receivable is included in the calculation of the penalty, with no deduction for any costs incurred by the enabler. However, any Value Added Tax (VAT) that may have been charged by the facilitator is not the consideration for these purposes and will not be taken into account in the calculation of the penalty.